Talk:Lolland-Falster
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sub-region articles?[edit]
As there are only 10 settlement articles in total is it useful to the reader to have sub-region articles? --Traveler100 (talk) 08:36, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- I would support merging Lolland and Falster into Lolland-Falster. Møn and Smålandsfarvandet could probably be kept but treated as city-articles rather than regions. MartinJacobson (talk) 23:25, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
- I was thinking initially four city articles, Lolland,Falster, Møn and Smålandsfarvandet. Then see how that looks. --Traveler100 (talk) 06:09, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yes that probably better than what I suggested. MartinJacobson (talk) 08:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Moving things around at the moment, will see how things look once in (initial) correct place. --Traveler100 (talk) 14:20, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yes that probably better than what I suggested. MartinJacobson (talk) 08:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- I was thinking initially four city articles, Lolland,Falster, Møn and Smålandsfarvandet. Then see how that looks. --Traveler100 (talk) 06:09, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Region articles[edit]
Region articles should not have detailed listings for points of interest, restaurants, shops, or hotels. Wikivoyage:Region article template says:
- "Individual listings should be placed at the lowest available level of local page (a district of a huge city or the city page for a small town)."
- "points of interest (such as those mentioned in "See" sections) should not usually have markers in region articles but should be linked to the bottom-level article where they have full listings."
I have moved the details to the city articles. Please do not add details for other listings here. Ground Zero (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2023 (UTC)