User talk:129.215.90.53

From Wikivoyage
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello, 129.215.90.53! Welcome to Wikivoyage.

To help get you started contributing, we've created a tips for new contributors page, full of helpful links about policies and guidelines and style, as well as some important information on copyleft and basic stuff like how to edit a page. If you need help, check out Wikivoyage:Help, or post a message in the travellers' pub.

By the way, have you considered creating an account here? While you can absolutely keep contributing as an anonymous user, it promises a bunch of benefits, and no obligations.--ϒpsilon (talk) 17:37, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your contributions to Isle of Arran! If you turn the article into a good Guide by putting Geo and/or street addresses into the rest of the listings, it will eventually be a good Off the beaten path feature on the front page. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if you are the same user now, but please don't edit war, and please edit within the SEO, Wikivoyage:Apt and don't tout guidelines. If you'd like to argue about edits to Edinburgh/Leith, please do so at Talk:Edinburgh/Leith. If you have any questions for me, please make sure to read the links I've provided for you, first. And you can see my edit summaries here if you'd like more information. Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:41, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think there is some confusion here. I didn't even touch the listing that you deleted. As for the other listings, I just added geo and address information and updated urls. So I don't think I did anything wrong. (Update: After looking at the article history, it seems that we just changed information around the same time. I obviously made changes to a slightly older article version, and like that your first deletion got added back in. Concerning the listing you deleted: I never meant to add it back in and agree that it shouldn't have been in the article in the first place. I hope that clarifies the issue.) 129.215.90.53 13:58, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I see. That makes perfect sense. Thanks for explaining and keep up the good work! Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.