Talk:Cardiff
Hi All, Anyone from Cardiff may be interested in EduWiki conference run by Wikimedia UK on 1-2 November 2013. The registration for EduWiki conference is open (link on the event page), so anyone interested to attend is welcome to book in October. Queries about the conference or any other aspect of Wikimedia UK's Education activities can be sent directly to WMUK's Education Organiser toni.sant@wikimedia.org.uk
Many thanks, Daria Cybulska (WMUK) (talk) 14:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
I've removed Floyd's from "for a quieter drink" as it's had a change of focus to be more like a nightclub.--RobsterUK (talk) 12:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Remaining tasks[edit]
The main obvious remaining task seems to be to put a map into this article. Otherwise, does it seem ready to nominate for Destination of the Month? Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:06, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
This guide is only outline status[edit]
I am sorry to say but although the content really is at guide status, the article can really only be set to outline status. None of the See attractions and few of the Eat listings have location information; neither address, directions or coordinates. --Traveler100 (talk) 19:36, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Eat substructure[edit]
Why was my edit reverted tidying up the Eat section into areas? Other articles such as https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Liverpool#Eat do this.
- You tried to force a geographical subdivision. Listings in Wikivoyage must be subdivided by price: "Budget" / "Mid-range" / "Splurge". This consensus is several years old. Please read the policies. Ibaman (talk) 19:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Splitting up "Eat" listings by location seems fine to me. Wikivoyage:Article skeleton templates/Sections says "Restaurant listings should be divided, if necessary, by price, by location or by cuisine." In practice most articles split by price, but I've certainly seen articles that organize the section differently—Rock Hill comes to mind as an example. —Granger (talk · contribs) 20:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- This Eat section, particularly, was subdivided by price before the anonymous user's edits. Changing the current subdivision without discussing looks very disruptive IMHO. Ibaman (talk) 20:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- My feeling is that it's OK to divide by price and subdivide by location or to divide by location and subdivide by price. What's not OK is to divide only by location. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Incidentally, I would heavily criticize Liverpool#Eat for dividing only by location. That's really unhelpful to anyone for whom the sky is not the limit. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Good points, both. I didn't realize that the IP user was removing the existing price divisions—I think that would need prior discussion, at least. —Granger (talk · contribs) 20:54, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Incidentally, I would heavily criticize Liverpool#Eat for dividing only by location. That's really unhelpful to anyone for whom the sky is not the limit. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- My feeling is that it's OK to divide by price and subdivide by location or to divide by location and subdivide by price. What's not OK is to divide only by location. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- This Eat section, particularly, was subdivided by price before the anonymous user's edits. Changing the current subdivision without discussing looks very disruptive IMHO. Ibaman (talk) 20:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Splitting up "Eat" listings by location seems fine to me. Wikivoyage:Article skeleton templates/Sections says "Restaurant listings should be divided, if necessary, by price, by location or by cuisine." In practice most articles split by price, but I've certainly seen articles that organize the section differently—Rock Hill comes to mind as an example. —Granger (talk · contribs) 20:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)