Talk:Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Should these three be grouped together like this? They are so far apart, they must have almost nothing in common from the traveler's perspective. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 01:52, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Officially, the three of them make part of one only British overseas territory, I think that's why. The Understand section is brief but very clear. Ibaman (talk) 01:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- I see the rationale, but at the same time, does that mean much if you visit the islands? --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 02:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- As each of them has its own page already, I think it's appropriate to have this "region article" grouping them in the official entity in which they belong. I would object more to the recent creation of separate articles under Hong Kong/Outlying Islands, for example, as I imagine these to be very tiny, very close apart, and very sparse of attractions and Eat or Sleep options individually. But this page here, I don't think it excessive. Ibaman (talk) 02:09, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- I'm coming round to your view. By the way, thanks for the your work cleaning up after the vandalism just now. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 02:18, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- As each of them has its own page already, I think it's appropriate to have this "region article" grouping them in the official entity in which they belong. I would object more to the recent creation of separate articles under Hong Kong/Outlying Islands, for example, as I imagine these to be very tiny, very close apart, and very sparse of attractions and Eat or Sleep options individually. But this page here, I don't think it excessive. Ibaman (talk) 02:09, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- I see the rationale, but at the same time, does that mean much if you visit the islands? --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 02:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)