User talk:Ji-soo Seo
Hello, Ji-soo Seo! Welcome to Wikivoyage.
To help get you started contributing, we've created a tips for new contributors page, full of helpful links about policies and guidelines and style, as well as some important information on copyleft and basic stuff like how to edit a page. If you need help, check out Help, or post a message in the travellers' pub. If you are familiar with Wikipedia, take a look over some of the differences here.--ϒpsilon (talk) 04:34, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
용인
[edit]Hi Ji-soo Seo .
I beleive the city you are trying to create is called 용인 in Korean, and already exists under the correct English spelling : Yongin
Do you mind if I delete your article? --Andrewssi2 (talk) 06:33, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
"Get around"
[edit]Hi, Ji-soo.
I noticed that you listed a bunch of names of sights in Ansan#Get around. That's not the function of the section. It is literally about how to get around Ansan — in other words, how to travel within the city. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:39, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
GPS coordinates
[edit]Wow, congratulations on adding the GPS coordinates to Ansan, even before I had a lecture explaining how to do it :) Remind me next class I owe you some extra credit! :) Since you already started, check out Wikivoyage:How to use dynamic maps - you may find easier ways of finding those GPS coordinates! --Piotrus (talk) 05:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I greatly appreciate that you're adding content and don't want to discourage you by seeming to criticize how you're editing, but unlike Wikipedia, we don't like lists on Wikivoyage (as a matter of fact there is a Wikivoyage:Avoid long lists page). I don't think it's really most useful to visitors to see the entire list of stations on a subway line, and if s/he wants to see that, a link to the subway's website would be most helpful. You can see New York City#By Subway as an example of how to summarize a really huge subway system that has literally hundreds of stops.
Similarly, the top 10 list of attractions for tourists is best listed with full "See" listings that include addresses, phone numbers, URLs if any, descriptions, opening hours and prices. I would not list them by number but alphabetically. At most, it might be helpful to start the "See" section by mentioning in prose that Yongin's City Hall recommends the following as the top 10 attractions for visitors to the city, and then you can mention them in a list without numbers but in order from 1 to 10, but I wouldn't do that for the listings, themselves.
I hope this makes sense. Please ask me a question if there's any part of this that doesn't make sense to you or which you don't understand.
All the best,
Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:35, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- I'm reconsidering. It actually could make sense to list them from 1 to 10 and say you're doing it, but without putting the numbers in front of the listings, where I think they look funny, somehow. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:00, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jisoo,
Many thanks for working on Yongin!
I added a map to the article and noted that some of the listings are appearing from 20km to 40km away from the area. Are you sure these are correct?
Feel free to look at the new map on Yongin to check! Thanks --Andrewssi2 (talk) 10:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Andrewssi2, thank you for adding the map! I checked the locations but I think there are no mistakes. Yongin is a big province, so it can appear from 20km to 40km. Thanks Ji-soo Seo (talk) 15:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Ansan history
[edit]Hello. Thanks for adding some history, but I reverted your edit. It was too detailed and encyclopedic in character, it had Wikipedia-like red links for things that are not and cannot be articles on Wikivoyage, suggesting the possibility that you may have copied and pasted them verbatim from somewhere, and it was full of refs, which we don't use on this site. Would you please summarize the history in a way that avoids these problems and is likely to be interesting to a prospective visitor to Ansan who is neither a specialist in archeology or history nor someone looking for an encyclopedic article? Thanks a lot. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Ikan Kekek, thanks for advice. I agree with that. I will correct history section. Ji-soo Seo (talk) 11:51, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)