Talk:Chiricahua National Monument

Chiricahua National Monument lodging

moved from User talk:(WT-en) Wrh2

I noticed that you removed a B&B listing from the Chiricahua article, presumably planning on putting it in Willcox instead. Laying aside that it was toutish, I think a reasonable case can be made that it's as appropriate in the monument article as in the city one. I've been through there, and the B&B, if it's the one that I'm remembering, is waaaay out in the boonies and in no sense well suited for a trip "to" Willcox. I can't imagine why anyone would stay there except in conjunction with a trip to Chiricahua. Let's discuss. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 21:48, 25 March 2009 (EDT)

Yeah, I moved it to the Willcox article since the address was there, and then added pointers in the "Lodging" section of this article to the two city articles that have lodging. If it makes sense to include it in this article, and if there's a way to do so that prevents lodging from nearby cities from showing up in the park article, then by all means let's do so - I was just trying to avoid the problems that we originally had with Yosemite where every border town lodging was being added to the park article despite the fact that it was a fair drive from most of them into the park. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:56, 25 March 2009 (EDT)