Talk:Rhine Falls

merging with schaffhausen

I decided not to merge this into Schaffhausen for several reasons:

• technically, it is not in Schaffhausen but Neuhausen am Rheinfall, which is far less known
• The article about Winterthur (and others?) also mentions it
• the "Get in" section is quite large and would be more complicated if it was split up and distributed over the different city articles

Your call ;-)

Blubb 08:31, 30 January 2007 (EST)

I would also keep it seperate, especially if there are more pictures to come here. Greetings --82.130.90.24 03:22, 3 March 2010 (EST)

The problem is that unless you can sleep at the falls (literally at the falls) it doesn't fit the "can you sleep here" criteria of being it's own article. Haven't been there myself so maybe I'm wrong. Are there campsites/hotels or the like at the falls?

If not it would be better to include it in the "get out" section of Scaffhausen and/or Zermatt (with the different directions on how to get there on those articles. - (WT-en) Kayla 02:50, 13 March 2010 (EST)

It should definitely be a part of Schaffhausen, it is very close to it and generally seen as the highlight of that city for most travellers. --(WT-en) globe-trotter 09:40, 7 June 2010 (EDT)

Good spot. I will merge and then redirect. (WT-en) jan 09:57, 7 June 2010 (EDT)

Image not showing up?

Image:Rhinefalls.jpg 

not showing up for me atleast. --(WT-en) Varajou89 06:20, 24 May 2010 (EDT)