Talk:South Downs
anything else it could do with - actually could anyone draw a map?
could you reinstate the links, there is so much accommodation, I feel that a blank section is far less helpful than a link, which would help tourists, I don't mind about the demoting - just pop the links back in --User:(WT-en) Profjack
- If http://www.southdownsonline.org/ is an official link (sanctioned by the South Downs governmental authority), it can be installed once at the top of the article after South Downs (like that). We don't avoid hard work by just putting up a link. We want the information to appear in Wikivoyage. We want actual listings of good places for travellers to go to. -- (WT-en) OldPine 21:37, 6 December 2007 (EST)
it is an official link, provided by the south downs authority, as is the link I posted, for same strange reason we have multiple authorities, the link is not a booking agent it is just there to help travellers; for that reason, and that reason only I am reinstating it. - Comment by User:(WT-en) Profjack
I edited it again per policy as stated above. I see no reason why policy should be different for this region. If you don't like the overall policy, you can try to get a consensus for your views and get it changed. (WT-en) OldPine 08:16, 8 December 2007 (EST)
Start a discussion about South Downs
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikivoyage the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve South Downs.
