Talk:Virginia Beach

Apparent copyvio

Much of the text in this article seems to be from vbgov.com, which is not public domain -- the terms of use states "You acknowledge that you have no right to the intellectual property associated with this Web site and that you have only a limited right to use this Web site." I have removed infringing bits. If they are re-posted, please only do so after leaving a comment as to why the content can be licensed CC-SA. -- (WT-en) Ryan 13:53, 10 Aug 2005 (EDT)

I've also removed text that is copied from Wikipedia. Wikivoyage uses the Attribution-ShareAlike license, while Wikipedia uses GFDL. See Project:Why Wikivoyage isn't GFDL and Project:Cooperating with Wikipedia for a discussion of why Wikipedia content can't be used here. Note however that if the Wikipedia text came from a public domain source, or if the same author wrote both, then it can be used on Wikivoyage, but please leave a comment indicating why there isn't a copyright violation. -- (WT-en) Ryan 14:05, 10 Aug 2005 (EDT)

non-facts presented as facts in Association for Research and Enlightenment passage

Within the "See" section, in the Association for Research and Enlightenment entry, factual statements are made about Edgar Cayce and his apparent "clairvoyance" that are not factual. This passage could be more "fair" and read less like a pamphlet published by this controversial organization.

For more info: http://www.randi.org/encyclopedia/Cayce,%20Edgar.html