Talk:Kyoto/North

Head Zen Temples

I've been mulling this over, but I might as well bring it up here. While most temples are themselves a site to see, some of the top Zen temples are just general names (Daitokuji and Myoshinji being the ones I am currently thinking of), while the sites that people visit are actually sub-temples, each with their own names, sites, and admission fees.

I don't know if there is an established rule for this, but do you think it would be better to organize it like this:

• <see name="Myoshinji" alt="" address="" directions="" phone="" email="" fax="" url="" hours="" price=""></see>
  • <see name="Taizo-in" alt="" address="" directions="" phone="" email="" fax="" url="" hours="Hours" price="Entrance fee">Description of sub-temple</see>
  • <see name="Daishin-in" alt="" address="" directions="" phone="" email="" fax="" url="" hours="Hours" price="Entrance Fee">Description of sub-temple</see>
  • <see name="Torin-in" alt="" address="" directions="" phone="" email="" fax="" url="" hours="Hours" price="Entrance fee">Description of sub-temple</see>

OR just have one attraction listing and then give names, info, and prices for ALL sub-temples open to visitors (like Daitokuji is currently listed)? (WT-en) ChubbyWimbus 00:30, 1 July 2009 (EDT)