Talk:Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Nice to see interest in this park, but might it be better as an attraction under Johnson City (Texas)? Unless I'm missing something, it's a day-use park only and you can't sleep there, which probably disqualifies it as a destination. Our policy on United States National Parks is somewhat inconsistently applied, so I could be argued out of this, but a merge and redirect looks best to me. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 19:23, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- I'd support a redirect to Johnson City... this seems like it's more of a museum, even though it's called a nat'l park... really doesn't seem like it needs its own article – (WT-en) cacahuate talk 19:52, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Yeah, the national historic sites are rarely, in my experience, comparable to the National Parks, or even National Monuments. They're usually small museums. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 20:22, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
Start a discussion about Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikivoyage the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park.
