Talk:Ocean Park

Undelete Discussion

• Undelete This one appears to have been speedy deleted by mistake. It has a population that can easily be found at Wikipedia and there is an official travel website for the location http://www.opwa.com . The listings may have been copied from another site, but just need a little formatting. This is a valid travel destination needs to be restored. -- (WT-en) Tom Holland (xltel) 17:07, 17 December 2006 (EST)
• Undelete. Definitely a valid destination. Remove the copyvio if any, not the article. -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 17:18, 17 December 2006 (EST)
• See comments above for #Union (Maine). If this had been created by a well-intentioned user I don't think there's any question that it should be kept, but Colin deleted it due to the author, who creates articles in the hopes of provoking Wikivoyage users. If it gets recreated by a well-intentioned user that's fine, otherwise I say leave it as-is. -- (WT-en) Ryan 17:22, 17 December 2006 (EST)
• Since it wasn't deleted via Project:Votes for deletion, and it was speedy deleted as being a mere page-creation troll, you are free to recreate the page at any time without the need of a vote. Or as I said in my speedy comment "feel free to recreate with content". -- (WT-en) Colin 17:46, 17 December 2006 (EST)

The policy indicates that an undelete of a speedy delete should be discussed here. I am not asking permission to recreate the article. I believe is should be undeleted so we can preserve the history. This also applies to #Union (Maine). -- (WT-en) Tom Holland (xltel) 18:53, 17 December 2006 (EST)

• Undelete. -- (WT-en) Andrew H. (Sapphire) 14:01, 18 December 2006 (EST)