User talk:74.7.158.162

Please note that deleting the price range for your hotel, moving it out of the price category that matches its price range, and adding info that jars with the presentation of every other sleep listing on the page is not welcome behavior, especially given that this is a star article, and the bar for changes is quite high. Since the listing's description is already pretty weak compared to the others on the page, I'm a little tempted to remove it outright if this continues. --(WT-en) Peter ^Talk 16:36, 27 January 2010 (EST)

Hi. I have reverted a few of your hotel entries. IMO they contained no useful information, and were pure touting. Thanks. --(WT-en) inas 17:51, 27 January 2010 (EST)

Hi, your hotel listing in Irving also contained no useful information. Please read the links provided to you above before adding any more listings. (WT-en) LtPowers 10:21, 28 January 2010 (EST)

Can you please acknowledge that you are receiving these messages. Otherwise you may be blocked for a short time to ensure that you have seen them. We don't want you to waste so much of your time on additions that are being reverted. --(WT-en) inas 17:17, 28 January 2010 (EST)

And please do not delete the short form of a hotel url and place the booking page link instead. Wherever possible, given the stated WT aim of being a printable travel guide, we use short form urls. --(WT-en) Burmesedays 12:46, 29 January 2010 (EST)

I realize that you aren't reading or responding to messages left on this page, but if you ever do notice the blinking red dot and view this page please refer to our guidelines for hotel marketers, which explains how you can contribute without having your contributions immediately reverted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:46, 13 July 2010 (EDT)