Talk:Chikmagalur (district)

See section

The list of places are not within city of Chikmagalur. They are spread around the district, as seen in the map. Mindless revert should stop. Soarwakes (talk) 07:08, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Please read your user talk page. As was already explained to you by Ibaman, Wikivoyage policy is to have full listings of specific sights (and also specific hotels, restaurants, etc.) in articles for cities, not region-level articles like this one. If a point of interest isn't in a city that merits its own article, you can create an "Outside of town" subsection of "See" in the article for the nearest city. You may briefly mention major highlights in region articles, but they shouldn't have full templated listings, nor should the listings be very detailed at the region level. Does that make sense? If not, please ask a question, but don't continue edit warring. Thanks a lot. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:06, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

It's probably useful for you to look at Wikivoyage:Region article template. That page explains things in a more holistic way. Here's the description of the "See" section in region articles:

This is for an overview of the types of attractions as well as the principal attractions in the region. Don't give full details about each attraction; you should have that in the article for the city where the attraction is. If the there isn't anything to say about the region's sights that isn't already covered by the descriptions in the Regions/Cities/Other destinations sections, or in the Understand section, then this section can be omitted.

Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

I have added them in the city article. Soarwakes (talk) 10:24, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Great! Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC)