Talk:Corpus Christi
This is sounding a lot more like a travel brochure than a travel guide. I was originally suspicious that it was copied from somewhere, but Google doesn't seem to be locating any of the key phrases. What's the deal? --(WT-en) Evan 14:53, 28 Jan 2004 (EST)
- You were correct, but your google-fu was weak: try . 207.134.56.158 15:33, 20 Feb 2006 (EST)
Took out Christy Estates under Sleep as they no longer have hotel spa suites, just regular long term apartments. —The preceding comment was added by 76.16.70.27 (talk • contribs) 22:46, 22 July 2011
Photos with the photographer's name on them
[edit]This article is unusual in having a bunch of photos with the photographer's name on them. I've seen that other users like User:Texugo routinely remove such images from Wikivoyage articles, but I don't know where there's a page showing that such photos are preferably not used in this guide. Should we try to find substitutes for the remaining photographs with names on them? Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know if that policy is written down anywhere, but I also thought it looked out of place having a guy's name all over the photos. –Thatotherpersontalkcontribs 10:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Looking at the image in question, it should be within the license to create a new picture with the lowest 5% cut off. Just as long as attribution is maintained in the new image's page on WikiMedia. --Andrewssi2 (talk) 11:27, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- There were 4 such images until I deleted the one in "Go next"; now there are 3. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:31, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- I was wrong: There were 5, and now there are 3. There just are not enough good photos of Corpus Christi - particularly these subjects - on Commons. Someone who knows the city well (I've never been there) might decide to replace some of the images in question with photos of other subjects - or to cut the name off, as Andrewssi2 suggests. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Not visible on the page. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)