Talk:Dallas/Deep Ellum

Can you sleep there?

If the article itself says no, why is there an article in the first place? Hobbitschuster (talk) 20:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Because Deep Ellum is a well-defined, famous district, and because the sleep test is not intended to help us draw district lines below the city level. Texugo (talk) 20:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Okay. But it does affect our district statuses as we currently define them. If you cannot sleep there, there can not by definition be any listing of any place to sleep within that district. Hence it would be condemned to perpetual outline status. Hobbitschuster (talk) 20:52, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

No, just because a district may have no accommodations of its own doesn't mean it gets stuck at outline. If there is really nothing to put in Sleep, then it is perfectly accurate, so just disregard that and carry on with evaluating the rest of the article. Texugo (talk) 21:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

I agree with you, but our policy as it stands now does not allow for that (at least not in the letter of the law sense). If we follow what it says at Wikivoyage:City guide status a sleep listing is necessary. And there is no differentiation between cities or districts... Thanks, I will raise the issue there... Hobbitschuster (talk) 21:33, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Btw: I have changed the status to usable, I hope that's okay. Hobbitschuster (talk) 21:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)