Borobudur temple is within Magelang district, some kilometres outside the town itself. It has its own page. The Sleep listing on this Magelang page contains accommodation that is at Borobudur, and is also given on the Borobudur page. I propose deleting the duplications on this page, perhaps indicating that more accommodation can be found at Borobudur itself. Tawonmadu (talk) 23:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Please go ahead and do that. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
What if somewhere is out of town?
Just reverted an edit that had removed listings that were deemed 'very far away'. Sure, they were out of town, but I would consider them valid interest to travellers, so the listing should go somewhere. I chose that page for the listings because it is for the nearest large town. To create a new page for the place they actually are would create a stub. Seemed to me more useful to place the listing with others. Any thoughts on how to deal with listings that don't obviously belong in any one particular place? Tawonmadu (talk) 01:39, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Tawonmadu: I think it belongs in Nearby section, see Wikivoyage:Small city article template#Go next. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:10, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- That might work, thanks for the suggestion. But it works best if the Nearby section could be standalone without being a subsidiary of Go Next. These are places that are a day trip out of a city. They are not a place to go to next, they are a place to visit when staying in the place described in the article. Go Next doesn't work for that. But that would also push everything to the bottom of the article. Look at the article for Kebumen for example. Lots of interesting stuff, but would nearly all have to be pushed down into the Nearby category as most is not in the city at all.Tawonmadu (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)