Talk:Sligo

From Wikivoyage
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Ikan Kekek in topic Glasshouse listing
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What is the point of the extensive listing of stores in the buy section with no addresses or phone numbers? 65.96.227.45 12:28, 3 July 2007 (EDT)

Feel free to plunge forward, use a phone book and add the missing information. This is a wiki - all of us can contribute to make it better! (WT-en) Riggwelter 12:35, 3 July 2007 (EDT)
These listings are of no value and should be deleted. (WT-en) WindHorse 11:51, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
The hotels also need classifying under 'Budget' or 'Mid range'. My personal knowledge of Ireland only extends as far as Cork and Waterford, so I'm afraid I cannot help. (WT-en) WindHorse 11:54, 9 July 2007 (EDT)

Updated article

[edit]

Well, it's taken me some time (I do have a life!), but I've significantly updated this article to include much more information on Sligo. I've changed it to a {{usablecity}} article, but how do I know if I can call it a {{guidecity}}? Perhaps more is required to get it to this standard? As I've amended it, I'd feel wrong just calling it a guide, even though I think it probably is. (and yes, I do have more information to add to it, jsut haven't got there yet, give me time!). --(WT-en) The.Q 10:52, 19 October 2007 (EDT)

The article is looking wonderful--my hat's off to you! I would, though, encourage you to add content to the "get out" section to make the article truly guide-quality. A short bulleted list of nearby (and related) destinations worth visiting would do the job nicely. This, I think, is a good example of how to present the "get out" information, although the list of nearby destinations for Sligo does not need to be so long. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 18:06, 23 October 2007 (EDT)
Thanks. I have now added some ===Get Out=== info, mostly thrown together from memory (with some help from various Wikivoyage and Wikipedia articles), but it's a start. I'd be interested to know what anyone thinks. --(WT-en) The.Q 08:03, 25 October 2007 (EDT)
As usual, the quality of your work exceeds all usual expectationsthe get out section looks great! --(WT-en) Peter Talk 15:19, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

usablecity template v guidecity template

[edit]

Swept in from the pub:

I've just updated the Sligo article, and now I've hit a minor problem. How do I decide if it's a {{usablecity}} or {{guidecity}} article? As I've made most of the changes to the page recently, I think it's a guide, but because I'm Irish (we don't like blowing our own trumpets!), I'm not confident enough to call it a guide. How do I know which I should call it? --(WT-en) The.Q 11:06, 19 October 2007 (EDT)

Thanks for asking, and may your tribe increase -- this kind of introspection and consensus-building is a good thing. I believe that's a Guide-level article and have made the indicated change, but to answer your question directly, check Project:Article status for general guidance as to when Guide or Usable are appropriate, and Project:City guide status for info specific to City articles. (BTW, I have a few suggestions for further improvements to that article that I'll leave on your talk page, although you've done a tremendous job with it.) -- (WT-en) Bill-on-the-Hill 11:55, 19 October 2007 (EDT)

Glasshouse listing

[edit]

Is this hotel a particularly important building? The photo has nice light, but the building doesn't seem special to me, giving rise to my thought that it is a promotional image, in violation of Listings#Avoid using images guidelines. Would anyone object if the image were removed? Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2013 (UTC)Reply