Talk:Worcester Hills

Is this not a region, rather than a town, and is covered by Quabbin? --Traveler100 (talk) 21:33, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

I meant it to be a bottom level article. I didn't realize that region article templates don't have the listing editor, which I want for this article. I tried to reclassify it as a city, but that didn't seem to work so I flagged it for deletion and figured I would start over.

None of the towns I would include here have an article and only two (Barre & Hubbardston) are mentioned in one of the other regions (Quabbin). I guess you could shoehorn Barre into the Quabbin, but it doesn't actually border the reservoir and it's not near an access point so I think it makes more sense as part of a Worcester Hills article. Basically, these towns are all semi-rural exurbs of Worcester. I'm not super attached to the Worcester Hills name, but I thought it was a nice way to describe them. Godsendlemiwinks (talk) 16:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

I fixed the listing editor issue, so this page is fine now.Godsendlemiwinks (talk) 23:41, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, my misunderstanding. If this is intended to collect a number of small communities together as a bottom level article then it is a city article. However it should under one of the sub-regions of Central Massachusetts . Are all the locations in Quabbin?--Traveler100 (talk) 05:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

No, Spencer, Leicester, Paxton, and Rutland weren't included in any of the existing regions. The Quabbin page lists Barre, Hubbardston, Oakham and New Braintree as constituent towns, but there is no content about them. They don't really belong there, I think someone must have stuck them there when dividing up all the towns because they didn't fit into another article. Godsendlemiwinks (talk) 14:12, 17 May 2015 (UTC)