Wikivoyage talk:India Expedition/Gujarat
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Champaner-Pavagadh Archaeological Park[edit]
Ikan Kekek and Saqib: Should we keep Champaner-Pavagadh Archaeological Park? The article is empty. In my opinion the park is Baroda' major attraction. It's 45 km away from the city center, easily reachable by bus or taxi. What do you say? --Gobbler (talk) 20:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Its a UNESCO site so it has potential to become a good guide at some point. Lets keep it. We can fill it up by taking some material from Wikipedia page. --Saqib (talk) 09:51, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- I haven't been to the area, but it seems to me, having added 8 photos to the Vadodara guide tonight, that there is quite a lot to see and do within Vadodara itself. The Vadodara article can be enlarged with information about where to see concerts, where to take classes that last for around 2 weeks or less in various subjects and where to hear lecture series, for example, not to mention more information about where and what to buy. So I'm unconvinced it's necessary to fold the article about the archeological park into the Vadodara article even if it's the main reason for a tourist to visit that city. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:08, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestions. I'll try to improve both articles. Fill free to correct my poor English Putting two sentences together it's still a hard task for me :-( --Gobbler (talk) 17:52, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- I haven't been to the area, but it seems to me, having added 8 photos to the Vadodara guide tonight, that there is quite a lot to see and do within Vadodara itself. The Vadodara article can be enlarged with information about where to see concerts, where to take classes that last for around 2 weeks or less in various subjects and where to hear lecture series, for example, not to mention more information about where and what to buy. So I'm unconvinced it's necessary to fold the article about the archeological park into the Vadodara article even if it's the main reason for a tourist to visit that city. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:08, 31 January 2015 (UTC)