Talk:Jedburgh
Latest comment: 5 years ago by ARR8 in topic Population
Population
[edit]There seems to be a disagreement about the population of Jedburgh. w:Jedburgh says 4090. On the official census results it gives 4030, using the 2011 census and a Locality 2010 type area of Jedburgh - the map then shows a few houses on the edge of town aren't counted. So I think our figure of 4100 should stay. If anybody prefers an alternative figure then please justify it. AlasdairW (talk) 14:55, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- There is no disagreement. There is an anonymous vandal trying to add misinformation. ARR8 (talk | contribs) 18:13, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- I saw that the IP had only edited here, and didn't see the other edits - there is something odd about the logs here. A 12% increase in population looked like it could be genuine and so was worth investigating. AlasdairW (talk) 23:38, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Or we could say about 4,000. As long as it's reasonably accurate, it's fine with me. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 03:55, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- @AlasdairW: See my link above. ARR8 (talk | contribs) 21:59, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- @ARR8: Your link only shows 3 pages called windows being created. I only saw the 2 edits of Jedburgh, which you can see using my link. If you see different numbers of pages being edited, you may need to log out (or use a different browser) to see what a regular editor can see. AlasdairW (talk) 22:16, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- @AlasdairW: Yes, that is what I see. Sorry, I didn't get what you meant earlier; my fault completely. I can see how the edit would look genuine if you hadn't seen the articles being created and deleted. ARR8 (talk | contribs) 22:22, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- @ARR8: Your link only shows 3 pages called windows being created. I only saw the 2 edits of Jedburgh, which you can see using my link. If you see different numbers of pages being edited, you may need to log out (or use a different browser) to see what a regular editor can see. AlasdairW (talk) 22:16, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- @AlasdairW: See my link above. ARR8 (talk | contribs) 21:59, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- Or we could say about 4,000. As long as it's reasonably accurate, it's fine with me. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 03:55, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- I saw that the IP had only edited here, and didn't see the other edits - there is something odd about the logs here. A 12% increase in population looked like it could be genuine and so was worth investigating. AlasdairW (talk) 23:38, 1 February 2019 (UTC)