Talk:Lübeck
see also: Talk:Lübeck/Archive
Guide and OtBP/DotM?
[edit]What would y'all consider missing for promotion to guide and featuring? (either as DotM or as OtBP, I could go either way on this) Hobbitschuster (talk) 16:18, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- The first half of the article looks good, though some See listings lack (or have short) descriptions and maybe a photo or two could be moved down to sections with no photos. The clubs and discos from Do should be moved to Drink and get some descriptions (closed ones should of course be deleted), and something has to be done about the short bullet points. Buy could use some individual listings. Eat more listings, probably division into Budget/Mid-range/Splurge. Drink coordinates (and it would be expanded by places from Do mentioned before). Sleep needs some coordinates and descriptions, and maybe a few more places to sleep. Go next looks OK. --Ypsilon (talk) 16:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- The discos have been moved to "drink" and geocoded with a bit of pruning of what appeared to be closed ones... Hobbitschuster (talk) 19:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Great! Lübeck could work both as DotM and OtBP and there's plenty of time to improve the article and nominate it for a summer 2021 slot. --Ypsilon (talk) 19:45, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- The discos have been moved to "drink" and geocoded with a bit of pruning of what appeared to be closed ones... Hobbitschuster (talk) 19:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Swept in from the pub
So as can be seen by taking a look at the page history, I did some work on Lübeck, a city I've not been in in a while (sadly) but which I know well from memory and which de-wp covers extensively, no doubt in part due to the positive obsession of its citizens with its history (a tendency evident even in the 1920s written book "Buddenbrooks"). At any rate, the work I did while it may look like it produced many bytes was actually quite slight - we have had a raw diamond sitting around for ages. I know some of the sections that aren't "see" - and there is just so damn much to see on the island alone - are a bit sparse, so I'd really like your input as to how to get this even more polished... Hobbitschuster (talk) 16:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Everything as far as the bottom of 'Get in' looks top-notch. After that, most listings could do with more information, both qualitative stuff and contact details, opening hours etc. 'Get around' could also go into more detail about the different modes, e.g. have links to the bus operator, explain fares, list a few taxi companies etc. Get both of those done and it would be much improved.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 17:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)