Talk:Sacred Valley of the Incas

From Wikivoyage
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Questions about scope[edit]

I believe this article contains more than actually is in the Sacred Valley, but it's handier to have all the things around Cuzco in one article than to scatter it around in Get Out sections. "Sacred Valley and Around" would probably a better name, but I think people will understand anyway. (WT-en) Ronald 15:02, 4 Feb 2006 (EST)

Does this qualify as a wikivoyage article? We generally don't have articles for valleys. See Project:What is an article. (WT-en) Upamanyuwikivoyage( Talk )( (WT-en) Travel ) • 05:19, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

I think it does qualify, as a region of Peru. The "See" section however doesn't follow the Manual of style. I see the value in having the Inca Ruins sites gathered together for someone who is specifically interested in that, but in that case we should make a seperate travel topic or itinerary. For this article, if it's going to continue to be used as a "Region" article, the destinations should be divided up among the "Cities" and "Other destinations" sections, I think. – (WT-en) cacahuate talk 15:58, 24 June 2007 (EDT)

Salineras, Maras, Urubamba: Merge?[edit]

Swept in from the pub

Do we need two articles for Salineras and Maras? They could probably be merged into Maras or even Urubamba, I think. Any opposition? Nicolas1981 (talk) 07:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, because I haven't been to any of these places. But please start discussions on the appropriate talk pages and link them here. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:26, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nicolas1981, Ikan Kekek, as per Talk:Maras I agree on the merge of the content of Salinas into the "See"/"Go next" sections of the closer cities. --Andyrom75 (talk) 14:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You're not agreeing with me; I just wanted the discussion to be in the appropriate place. I have no opinion about this. Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:04, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek I agreed on the first question, but I've mentioned you too because you have taken part on the discussion. If you know the appropriate pages, you can highlight this one there, otherwise no problem. Cheers, --Andyrom75 (talk) 22:38, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]