User talk:80.187.74.187
For the umpteenth time, please stop making Wikivoyage a budget traveller-centric travel guide[edit]
I really don't think I need to say why but your recent editing activity has essentially confirmed my suspicion that you are Flightnavigator and if you're not, it's going to take a serious change it attitude to convince me that you're not Flightnavigator, at least per the duck test. Either way, I've told you this countless times before – stop making Wikivoyage more budget traveller-centric by removing perfectly fine, valid, meaningful mid-range restaurants. If you continue to do this, I might have to nominate you for a user ban, something I don't want to do. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 11:38, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- Making it easier to choose a Mid-range restaurant is an improvement and not making Wikivoyage more budget-centric.
- Making it easier to choose a Mid-range restaurant is an improvement and not making Wikivoyage more budget-centric.
- Who wants to have the choice between 24 mid-range restaurants in the Zurich article?
- Who wants to have the choice between 24 mid-range restaurants in the Zurich article?
- Anyway I'll let the mid-range restaurants in the Zurich article as they are despite I disagree.
- Yeah, but care to explain why you just arbitrarily removed random restaurants without a good explanation?
- To make it easier for the mid-range related traveller to choose a restaurant! There is a rule in Wikiviyage to only have 7±2 listings, which I followed. People don't want to choose between 24 listings. I did not remove randomly. I did let the best fitting there.
- In some Wikivoyage articles there is stated a request to take out restaurants, because there are too many.
- Anyway I cannot remember to have taken out mid-range restaurants for a better selectability in previous countless times...
- To make it easier for the mid-range related traveller to choose a restaurant! There is a rule in Wikiviyage to only have 7±2 listings, which I followed. People don't want to choose between 24 listings. I did not remove randomly. I did let the best fitting there.
- Yeah, but care to explain why you just arbitrarily removed random restaurants without a good explanation?
- Anyway I'll let the mid-range restaurants in the Zurich article as they are despite I disagree.
--SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 12:15, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.