Jump to content

Talk:Cotswolds

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikivoyage

Is it okay to break the template, and put 'settlements' or something instead, as there are lots of villages etc in the Cotswolds!

Useful archive

[edit]

A user was doing good sandbox work on this article, but seems to have abandoned the project. If anyone is feeling in the mood to improve this article, consider sifting and lifting the good content from his sandbox and moving it here. See User:(WT-en) Tristan Thomas/Cotswold Water Park --64.134.98.79 13:09, 23 February 2011 (EST)

Extraregion?

[edit]

This article is currently classed as a region and has a number of towns in its hierarchy. These towns are in a number of counties, the rest of England is organised by the counties rather then geographical boundaries. Also other Cotswold towns are in the county hierarchy. Should we move the towns under here to the correct counties? --Traveler100 (talk) 10:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Cotswolds have a long history of touristic importance, and merit a complete and beautiful article. We have a precedence on the article of Lake Tahoe, which is inserted on our structure under California but mentioning options in Nevada as well. Ibaman (talk) 12:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
I am not saying reduce the content of the page, just sort out the hierarchy in the area. In fact should, as you say, expand to cover the whole of the area and not just the Gloucestershire part. --Traveler100 (talk) 13:41, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Yes, we are on agreement. this article should be complete, as well as its map mask, let's go for it. ˜˜˜˜

Map Mask

[edit]

Boundary appears to be incorrect, only covering the Gloucestershire part of the Cotswolds. --Traveler100 (talk) 10:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Actually you're right. There isn't an exact definitive boundary of the Cotswold region, although this would appear to be a better version. Andrewssi2 (talk) 05:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:20, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply