Talk:Jinotega

From Wikivoyage
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Ikan Kekek in topic English editing
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Recent edits to Jinotega

[edit]
Swept in from the pub

Look at this diff, please. It's all edits by the same IP... What am I to do? I don't want to bite a newbie, but... Hobbitschuster (talk) 17:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Undo edits that are bad and put {{subst:welcomeanon}} on the IP's talk page plus a quick explanation of why the edits were undone. ϒpsilon (talk) 17:50, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Well I don't quite know what the good parts of said edits are... Furthermore the IP seems to confuse the departamento of Jinotega with the city itself. And as I know myself to be something of a newbie biter... Hobbitschuster (talk) 20:41, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Maybe we can use

[edit]

Spanish Wikipedia as a source for some things still lacking in this article... The article in es-WP appears to have a lot of information that does not belong into a WP article but might belong here... Hobbitschuster (talk) 16:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

English editing

[edit]

If you know what this means, please edit it:

"In the municipalities east of Jinotega: In Bloodsucker is a studied by geologists because it is believed that there fell a meteorite valley, besides rice is grown there is a village of warm weather, Farmhouse tourist place."

There's a town named Bloodsucker? And what is studied by geologists? Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Jinotega lost a lot of pictures

[edit]
Swept in from the pub

Besides the problems with this guide we had discussed earlier, it has now lost a lot of pictures due to copyright issues. What should we do? Hobbitschuster (talk) 15:13, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

There's not much you can do other than find additional photos on Commons, search Flickr for CC-compatible images to upload to Commons, or physically go there to take photos. Anyway, even as it is now the article still contains three photos, which is less than it might have but not problematic per se. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 15:15, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
I'd definitely spread out those pictures we still have within the article. Powers (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
The article also seems to confuse the city itself and the "departamento" Hobbitschuster (talk) 16:08, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply