Talk:Jungle Railway
Add topicLatest comment: 7 years ago by Wyote in topic Is this still possible?
Is this still possible?
[edit]I have been looking into going from Jeruntut to Kota Bharu on this railway, and I have looked all over the internet to confirm the information presented here, but as far as I can tell it is no longer in operation. Can anyone confirm that it is still possible to take a train on this route? Wyote (talk) 13:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
To Guide
[edit]This would be a fun Featured Travel Topic. A map of the route is needed and fares should be checked and updated, but what else is needed for this article to be a Guide? Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:45, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- I know it's just my pet peeve, but cutting down on the redlinks can't do much harm. Either by creating articles or by leaving out the links if articles are unlikely to be created. Or by redirecting the redlinks to the appropriate article... Hobbitschuster (talk) 12:30, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- There should be articles for the red-linked places, but as long as there are none, I would oppose eliminating the red links. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:35, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- The problem about redlinks is that they indicate some place may be of interest but is not covered. As there is no article (per definition) it is hard to find out, whether the place is actually interesting enough for its own article creating something of a Catch 22, until and unless somebody actually goes there or is able to competently argue why some hamlets are best left without an article on their own. (after all, we don't have an article for every spot on the map. As I said I know nothing of these redlinks and thus I don't know if any of them don't deserve an article, but one way or the other not having redlinks is a good thing. It should of course be achieved through stuff that actually improves WV not through some disingenuous moving around of stuff... Hobbitschuster (talk) 23:51, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- I agree. The redlinks are a problem that should be corrected. The places in question are towns, even perhaps small cities, and not hamlets. I don't know how much of interest to tourists is in some of them, but I think they deserve articles. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:52, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- The problem about redlinks is that they indicate some place may be of interest but is not covered. As there is no article (per definition) it is hard to find out, whether the place is actually interesting enough for its own article creating something of a Catch 22, until and unless somebody actually goes there or is able to competently argue why some hamlets are best left without an article on their own. (after all, we don't have an article for every spot on the map. As I said I know nothing of these redlinks and thus I don't know if any of them don't deserve an article, but one way or the other not having redlinks is a good thing. It should of course be achieved through stuff that actually improves WV not through some disingenuous moving around of stuff... Hobbitschuster (talk) 23:51, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- There should be articles for the red-linked places, but as long as there are none, I would oppose eliminating the red links. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:35, 25 July 2015 (UTC)