Talk:Surrey

From Wikivoyage
Jump to navigation Jump to search

So I removed Other Surreys: Surrey (disambiguation)

- I think it should read :
Note: This article is about the county called Surrey in England. There are other places called Surrey.

And should appear at the top of the page, if at all. I think there should be good justification before this header appears on the page. There is no need at present because the other Surrey pages have not been created ... yet. -- (WT-en) Huttite 03:38, 10 Jan 2005 (EST)

Too many towns in the cities section[edit]

I removed the following towns from this section as there was just a huge long list and it would not be useful to anyone at all as none of them have pages and most of them do not have much to do as such in the destination. If you make a page for one of these then put them back into the list!

(WT-en) Tsandell 07:19, 6 May 2006 (EDT)

Once the Dorking article gets created please add Wotton House[edit]

[1], I noticed the Principal Hayley hotel Wotton House is not listed, can we have it listed? I know there isn't a main page yet for Dorking, so probably best to wait for that. Send me a message if you require any details not public on the website VerbInteractive (talk) 13:47, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To save time here is the posting with only factual info (I can't post the listing as I represent the company)

VerbInteractive (talk) 15:22, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Same issue here as in Picardy: Surrey is a region, and normally, places to stay shouldn't be listed at the regional level. Why don't you create an article for Dorking, and then this listing can be included in it? Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:34, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing that out, I started the Dorking page. I will put the request for the hotel listing there. VerbInteractive (talk) 15:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]