Talk:Westmoreland (New Hampshire)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Traveler100 in topic Merge ?
Merge ?
[edit]On a quick search (so you may be able to prove me wrong) I could not find an hotel in this area. Suggest considering merging with Keene (New Hampshire) or West Chesterfield. If not merging should rename to Westmoreland (New Hampshire)--Traveler100 (talk) 16:28, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support merger. Does not look like there is much there. Ground Zero (talk) 00:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
dont merge merge chesterfield into this page —The preceding comment was added by 2601:18b:301:aa30:e582:b725:6b1:3ba (talk • contribs)
- OK I can see merging West Chesterfield as a valid alternative. --Traveler100 (talk) 17:21, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- This "merger mania" is getting ridiculous. One more time for the folks in the back: THE SLEEP TEST IS NOT A HARD-AND-FAST RULE; JUST BECAUSE THERE'S NO HOTEL IN A CERTAIN PLACE DOESN'T MEAN IT FAILS WIAA. Judging by the fact that there are plenty of listings in the other sections, Westmoreland can clearly sustain its own article, and frankly I'm getting tired of hearing about how articles should be merged just because "it's too small a town" or "there's not enough content". The consensus that those are not valid rationales for merging has been reaffirmed over and over again. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 20:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- At the time the merger was proposed, there was very little in this article, and even less when I commented above. It was just an annoying side trip for the reader. Since then, a lot of listings have been added, which is good. Ground Zero (talk) 20:23, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Also change my mind as there is now enough useful information. --Traveler100 (talk) 04:52, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- At the time the merger was proposed, there was very little in this article, and even less when I commented above. It was just an annoying side trip for the reader. Since then, a lot of listings have been added, which is good. Ground Zero (talk) 20:23, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- This "merger mania" is getting ridiculous. One more time for the folks in the back: THE SLEEP TEST IS NOT A HARD-AND-FAST RULE; JUST BECAUSE THERE'S NO HOTEL IN A CERTAIN PLACE DOESN'T MEAN IT FAILS WIAA. Judging by the fact that there are plenty of listings in the other sections, Westmoreland can clearly sustain its own article, and frankly I'm getting tired of hearing about how articles should be merged just because "it's too small a town" or "there's not enough content". The consensus that those are not valid rationales for merging has been reaffirmed over and over again. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 20:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)