Talk:Djémila
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This article contains content imported from the English Wikipedia article on Djémila. View the page revision history for a list of the authors. |
@Fayeqalnatour: This article is just a copy of two paragraphs from the Wikipedia article. How does that several travellers? If it included information on how to get in, where to stay and where to eat, it would be useful. If it isn't expanded, then it should be erased and redirected to the article for the nearest place for which we have that info. Ground Zero (talk) 16:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- For the record, while the facts on the ground are unknown to me, I really hope this is a valid destination. It's listed, but not linked, in the Roman Empire article. If it proves to be a valid article, I'll be happy. However, all sources found on a quick cybersearch unanimously say the traveller must eat and sleep at Sétif, 46 km northeast. Djémila is already mentioned in this article. Ibaman (talk) 16:48, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- I think that, if it passes the sleep test, we should keep it. But even otherwise, there are many articles in a similar or worse state than this one, so why redirect this one? --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 01:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- It does not. Sorry for not expressing myself clearly enough in the first time. The traveller must eat and sleep at Sétif. I corrected myself above for accuracy. Ibaman (talk) 01:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Then I'm actually enclined to redirect, or even perhaps delete because it's so far from the nearest place where you can eat and sleep. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 01:23, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete?! Valid search term, and also not too far from Sétif for a day trip in the least. If there truly is no place to sleep here, I'd suggest giving it a section such as "Nearby" or "Day trip" in Sétif#See and redirecting the search term to that subsection. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Who is talking about deleting? We're talking about redirecting. Ground Zero (talk) 04:29, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Read the post above mine, which I was replying to. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:22, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't know how I missed that. Ground Zero (talk) 05:25, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Read the post above mine, which I was replying to. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:22, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Who is talking about deleting? We're talking about redirecting. Ground Zero (talk) 04:29, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete?! Valid search term, and also not too far from Sétif for a day trip in the least. If there truly is no place to sleep here, I'd suggest giving it a section such as "Nearby" or "Day trip" in Sétif#See and redirecting the search term to that subsection. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Merger[edit]
- Support, as nominator, merger into Sétif as it provides no travel information, sbd is just a copy of part of a Wikipedia article. Ground Zero (talk) 10:38, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, go ahead and merge and redirect. No-one objected to that in the thread above, and I don't think we need to take a vote. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:51, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- This was really to see if @Fayeqalnatour: is willing to expand this article. Ground Zero (talk) 08:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- Fayeqalnatour has yet to show any evidence of reading anything on their user talk page or any edit summary or anything at all, so I am not hopeful. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:44, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- This was really to see if @Fayeqalnatour: is willing to expand this article. Ground Zero (talk) 08:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- I'd also support a merge. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 02:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, go ahead and merge and redirect. No-one objected to that in the thread above, and I don't think we need to take a vote. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:51, 30 October 2018 (UTC)