Talk:Doetinchem
Images
[edit]I'd like to thank Wauteurz for starting this article! Per Wikivoyage:Image policy#Montages and galleries, galleries should not be used in order to show sights, so the best and/or most interesting images that will fit well in this article at normal thumbnail size should be distributed around the article. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Revision of marking as 'outline'
[edit]The full article from the Dutch Wikivoyage has been translated, and all sections have some (usable) content. I'd appreciate it if the article would be listed as a usable article, instead of an outline. This talk section can be used to debate about why or why not its status should be updated.
-- Wauteurz (talk) 14:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- technically it is a usable article already, has enough information, so you can upgrade it yourself. I generally however try to get at least two places to sleep before upgrading to usable. --Traveler100 (talk) 18:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- I'll check to be sure, but I am pretty sure that Stadshotel de Graafschap is the only hotel in Doetinchem, but I'll double-check to be sure. I'll switch it to usable though.
-- Wauteurz (talk) 18:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- I'll check to be sure, but I am pretty sure that Stadshotel de Graafschap is the only hotel in Doetinchem, but I'll double-check to be sure. I'll switch it to usable though.
I am aware that I was the one to add it in the first place, but is the Orientation paragraph necessary? It feels more redundant than useful if I were to judge. Is it really worth keeping?
-- Wauteurz (talk) 13:39, 11 March 2017 (UTC)