Talk:Manaslu Trek

From Wikivoyage
Jump to navigation Jump to search

vfd[edit]

Manaslu Trek[edit]

Per the one year rule for itineraries. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 01:45, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be usable or close to usable. What would be the benefit/reason to merge the information to Annapurna Circuit? I will support a merge if it makes sense from a traveler's perspective, but I don't see this as a stubby outline in its current form. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 16:37, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It could be made usable with the addition of a map and geo. It's currently merely linked under Manaslu in Annapurna#Other destinations, which is probably not the ideal way to handle it, because who would be looking for it under "Asia itineraries", its current breadcrumb path? Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:51, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We could make it prominent, but isn’t breadcrumb under “[continent] itineraries” the normal procedure of itinerary categorization? I would support adding wikilinks if this is the best way to increase the Manaslu Trek article’s visibility. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 22:50, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It may be normal, but it's not where people are most likely to look for it. Merging may be the wrong idea, but is there a way to make this trek breadcrumb to Annapurna Circuit or Annapurna? Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:13, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would think that’s easily done. Create a category for Annapurna Circuit and change “isPartOf” parameter of the Manaslu Trek to “Annapurna Circuit,” and within a few hours or days the category page will update. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 10:19, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think it would be good to do that. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:53, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes Done --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 21:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome: Not deleted. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 02:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]