Talk:Nilpena Ediacara National Park

From Wikivoyage
Latest comment: 2 years ago by SHB2000 in topic selfreference
Jump to navigation Jump to search

selfreference[edit]

[1]

for self reference. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 05:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

And [2] SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 05:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
and [3] SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 05:36, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
and [4] SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 05:52, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
and [5] SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 07:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Newly created national parks that have yet to open to the public[edit]

Swept in from the pub

I'm currently in the process of creating Nilpena Ediacara National Park, which is a newly created national park that has yet to open to the public (will open in April). Currently, I've written it from the perspective that it has yet to open and I'm wondering on whether it should be in mainspace or not if its not open? And if it does stay in mainspace, should there be some sort of disclaimer box? I'd just like an opinion or two about this, because simply, I don't think this has ever happened on Wikivoyage before – and such occurrences of "new national parks created and not open to the public yet" is not a common thing anywhere. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 07:09, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

I think the article should go in mainspace. People plan trips months in advance, so any information on the park, however incomplete, is better than none. Putting it in mainspace may also attract new editors.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 07:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Sure, I'll leave it in mainspace. But should there be a {{disclaimerbox}} or a {{cautionbox}} at the top of the article? SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 07:32, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
There's no harm in adding a caution box, although IMO this currently rather short article is already clear that the park isn't yet open.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 09:51, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
I've added one. Can it be listed in Paleontology, or should I wait till the park opens before listing it there. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 10:27, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
The article's just been copyedited by Ground Zero here so it's not so repetitive that "the park is not open" in which I probably heavily overexaggerated it. Thanks GZ :) SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 11:44, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply