Talk:Parque Florestal de Monsanto

From Wikivoyage
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Individual parks usually do not get their own articles. If there isn't more to say about this, the information should be moved to Lisbon/North, and the article deleted. Ground Zero (talk) 18:40, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted or turned into a redirect? Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It is a city park of 10 km2. I don't think it is a likely search term, so I would delete under Wikivoyage:What is an article?. Ground Zero (talk) 21:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. However, if content from here is merged, isn't a redirect necessary for the edit history? Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:30, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have added this park to Lisbon/North using text adapted from Wikipedia, and without reference to this article. I think this article can be deleted per Wikivoyage:What is an article?. Ground Zero (talk) 00:03, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, think it can be speedied now SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 00:07, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK, go ahead. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ground Zero, Ikan Kekek: On another note, I did create an article about a park six times smaller than this park a couple of months ago, would that have to be deleted? (it's Malabar Headland National Park) SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 02:38, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Malabar Headland article has a surprising amount of information about such a small park. It is a useful article for travellers, so I would oppose deleting it. This article does not, though, so it is more useful to list it in a city article. Ground Zero (talk) 02:46, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
and then we have Sydney Harbour National Park, a star park article for a park with only an area of 3.92 km2... definitely not deleting that ;-) SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 02:53, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]