Talk:Raja Ampat
Oddness
[edit]- Swept in from the pub
This article is exhibiting some odd behavior. It shows up in the search of destination articles without IsPartOf, despite the fact that it has that template, and it shows in this search of non-destination articles with pagebanner, even though it is correctly categorized as a destination article and should therefore have been ignored. It's been this way for at least a week now, and I've tried purging the cache and all, but I can't seem to figure out what the problem is. Anyone have a clue? Texugo (talk) 17:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Traveler100, any ideas? You seem to be good at these things... Texugo (talk) 17:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Strange, on first look I do not understand it either. --Traveler100 (talk) 17:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- The results on that category scan tool show a page size of 12486 bytes, while the article history shows 15047 bytes. I'd guess there's maybe a hidden unicode character in there somewhere that is interfering with the category parser, but that's just a guess. -- Ryan • (talk) • 17:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- I tried deleting and undeleting the page, and it seems to have resolved the issue (so far at least). Texugo (talk) 13:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Earlier I had gotten rid of UTF-8 hidden character and fixed a few other characters - I did notice that the searches above still had the Feb 9 edit date when I tried searches after Feb 9. The information appeared as not being updated - I think deleting and undeleting forced the data to be updated... Good job! -- Matroc (talk) 21:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- The results on that category scan tool show a page size of 12486 bytes, while the article history shows 15047 bytes. I'd guess there's maybe a hidden unicode character in there somewhere that is interfering with the category parser, but that's just a guess. -- Ryan • (talk) • 17:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Strange, on first look I do not understand it either. --Traveler100 (talk) 17:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Openstreetmap links in "url" tabs
[edit]Per Wikivoyage:External links, only primary links should be used, so if a hotel has no website of its own, is it admissible to instead insert an Openstreetmap link for location? I would say no, and that the place for location information is "lat/long". Would User:Lasthib or anyone else like to argue that these Openstreetmap links are admissible and put in the right place, consider the guidelines in Wikivoyage's external links policy? Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)