Talk:Bradford
Some of the categories need expanding, as it still resembles a stub. J Thomas
- Yep, that's what the "outline" status box at the bottom of the article indicates. :) I've restored the standard headers that we use here on Wikivoyage. Take a look at Project:policies and guidelines and Project:Manual of style for more info about content and format for articles. - (WT-en) Todd VerBeek 08:04, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
Racial tension
[edit]Just rolled back an edit saying to avoid muslim areas at night, as I disagree that there is tension or a problem. Anyone else got an opinion? (WT-en) Andyfarrell 18:33, 24 November 2009 (EST)
roll back needed
[edit]the page needs a new roll back. Again there is racist stuff in it.
VFD discussion
[edit]Suburb with no useful travel information. Traveler100 (talk) 09:22, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Jjtk (talk) 10:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- Our policy is to always redirect real places—in this case, it should go to Bradford. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 18:08, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment, as a person originally based in Thornbury, Gloucestershire, I connected to a another Thornbury in a "twinning" request. If it helps, Wikipedia's "Thornbury" article is a disambigation page. 82.14.248.35 19:23, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- Redirect to Bradford until more knowledge is known. Maybe Bradford tourists can comment. Normsdale (talk) 14:44, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Redirect to Bradford Pashley (talk) 14:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Result: redirected Pashley (talk) 23:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Understand
[edit]Great improvements to this article. Thanks as ever to Graham for putting the hours in to improve Wikivoyage.
One thing, though: I don't agree with the merging of the Intro and Understand. Understand is an integral part of all Wikivoyage destination articles, and Bradford is hardly a special case. As a result of the merge, the intro is overlong. Ditto for Guernsey, btw. --ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 21:02, 9 September 2019 (UTC)