Talk:Bucheon

Propose a new banner image

I think it's better to add new image. 분야 한 지방 파노라마 - Pixabay의 무료 사진 Jeong seolah (talk) 06:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

I'm not seeing a Creative Commons Copyleft license on that page. It looks copyrighted, all rights reserved. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, doesn't seem to be released under a CC license per their license summary. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 04:18, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Errors

@Jeong seolah: thank you for the improvements you have made to this article. Here are some ways you can make it better:

1. the first paragraph of an article should explain why a reader would want to visit a place. What makes it interesting, beyond just that it is a resort town?
2. We know that the places listed are in Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, because the article is called "Bucheon". In English Wikivoyage, it is incorrect to include the city name in addresses in listings, unless the listing is in a different city (i.e., not in Bucheon).
3. In South Korea articles, we always use the 24-hour clock (09:00-18:00), not the 12-hour clock (9AM-5PM). See the box at the top of Talk:South Korea.
4. We write prices as "₩1,000", not "1,000₩"
5. We always include the country code in front of phone numbers, i.e., +82

Please make these changes. Thank you. Ground Zero (talk) 20:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Also please in the future try to use Wikivoyage:Article skeleton templates; it's standard on Wikivoyage to have empty sections. SHB2000 (t | c | m) 23:13, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Also, parts of it appear to be copyright violations, e,g. the text at Bucheon#Climate is from a local government page. You absolutely cannot just copy text or images here without getting permission from the copyright owner. In this case, three solutions are possible:

You get permission from the owner -- not just to use the text but to release it under our copyleft license -- and post evidence of that here.

You remove all copied text from the article. Post here when that is done so an admin can expunge it from the edit records; we do not want a copyvio even there.

We delete the entire article.

From an admin's point of view, deletion is the option that is most certain & the least work. @Jeong seolah: can you please do one of the first two options quickly? Failing that, I'd advocate deletion. Pashley (talk) 20:55, 12 November 2024 (UTC)