Talk:Da Nang
Both Da Nang and HaiPhong are mentioned here as "Vietnam's third largest city", but there should be only one :) —The preceding comment was added by 77.41.103.107 (talk • contribs) , 00:13, 15 August 2010
To Guide
[edit]This article seems to be almost at Guide status. The obvious thing it still needs is a map. Anything else? Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:40, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- How's this one? --Dragfyre (talk) 20:55, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Poor. No streets are labeled, no points of interest are shown, etc. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:42, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, OK. Will take a look at maps for some other cities and see how it could be improved. Alternatively, is {{Mapframe}} considered a good option? --Dragfyre (talk) 01:26, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- To my knowledge, all the Star articles that are either district articles themselves or about cities that are not divided into separate district articles use static maps. See, for example, Chicago/Loop. However, Tokyo/Roppongi is an example of an excellent Guide article that's been nominated for Star status and uses a dynamic map. The kind of dynamic map used in that article is being used more and more on this site. I should say, I don't think it's perfect because I have to zoom in to see more than a couple of street names, and it's actually very troubling that at the highest zoom level, there are still loads of unnamed streets. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:26, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- This article is as yet designated as only Usable, but it has a good dynamic map: Berlin/Mitte. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- As I understand it, using dynamic maps for Star articles is still open for discussion - which should really be carried out at Wikivoyage talk:Dynamic maps Expedition or Wikivoyage:Star nominations though there are pertinent comments at the pub. Right now there's a backlog of Star-nominated articles since there isn't a good agreement for usage. We do need direction, whether to work on static output or improve printing. For a guide article I think {{Mapframe}} does the job, particularly as many guides and even featured articles do not even have a basic map. Some of the places like Dakar and Tokyo just don't have a lot of named roads, a bit like Olgii, so it's not a purely dynamic map problem although Asia and Africa are indeed regions with poorer OSM coverage. If you do know the names of the roads, you can edit them at OSM using their new iD editor. -- torty3 (talk) 13:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- This article is as yet designated as only Usable, but it has a good dynamic map: Berlin/Mitte. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- To my knowledge, all the Star articles that are either district articles themselves or about cities that are not divided into separate district articles use static maps. See, for example, Chicago/Loop. However, Tokyo/Roppongi is an example of an excellent Guide article that's been nominated for Star status and uses a dynamic map. The kind of dynamic map used in that article is being used more and more on this site. I should say, I don't think it's perfect because I have to zoom in to see more than a couple of street names, and it's actually very troubling that at the highest zoom level, there are still loads of unnamed streets. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:26, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, OK. Will take a look at maps for some other cities and see how it could be improved. Alternatively, is {{Mapframe}} considered a good option? --Dragfyre (talk) 01:26, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Poor. No streets are labeled, no points of interest are shown, etc. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:42, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
It looks like this conversation was never wrapped up. Per City guide status, the map should not be an issue at all, as maps are only required for Star status articles. Thus, I am going to upgrade this article to guide status. GeneralPericles (talk) 06:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Additionally, to get it to Star status, I would recommend adding a dynamic map (I believe that's the consensus now?) and expanding the Work section to at least a paragraph. GeneralPericles (talk) 06:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
"Get in/By car"
[edit]This is the entirety of that subsection, moved here for discussion:
Here are list trust company in Hoi An offer Danang Airport transfer service and from Hoi An to Hue city.
- Hoi An Private Car
- Hanoi Transfer Services - +84982358282, info@hanoitransferservice.com
- Danang Airport Transfer
- Book A car Vietnam - (+84)911 577 117,info@bookacarvn.com
First of all, here is a list of trusted companies, etc. But trusted by whom? This seems more than a little touty. Which, if any, of these companies should we be listing? And if we do list them, a local address is essential, right? Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
DotM?
[edit]This Guide article one could make a nice DotM (or OtBP?) sometime in early 2017. Some listings lack coordinates, and I don't know if the Learn section needs to go into details such as which books Vietnamese language courses use. Anything else anyone thinks has to be fixed before the article can be put on the Main Page? ϒpsilon (talk) 18:58, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Anybody? ϒpsilon (talk) 15:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Remove "Bread of Life Western Bakery and Eatery"
[edit]The listing for Bread of Life is outdated and not a place I could recommend. A few years ago it was sold and while they say they hire the deaf and otherwise disabled I have seen no sign of this in my three visits there with friends. The food is fair and unremarkable.
Eat: What is "Budget", "Mid-range" and "Splurge?"
[edit]What constitutes "Budget", "Mid-range" and "Splurge?" Having lived there for a couple of years in my experience to the traveler "Budget" would be 20.000đ to 50.000đ, "Mid-range" 50.000đ to 500.000đ and everything else in "Splurge." Is this something that should be added as a guide?Thanks --Beelerb (talk) 15:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- You can use Template:Eatpricerange to create an infobox so that visitors know (roughly) what a cheap, mid-range or expensive meal will cost. ϒpsilon (talk) 16:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Bridge
[edit]Breathtaking Bridge In Vietnam Has Just Been Opened And It Looks Like Something From Lord Of The Rings Pashley (talk) 21:27, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Departing train schedules
[edit]I don't know if we want to keep these updated, but they were in "Get in" and clearly are not about getting in to Da Nang:
Da Nang to Hanoi
- Train SE2: Depart 12:06, Arrive 04:02 next day
- Train SE4: Depart 14:42, Arrive 05:00 next day
- Train SE6: Depart 10:34, Arrive 04:45 next day
- Train SE8: Depart 23:27, Arrive 15:28 next day
Da Nang to Hue
- Train SE2: Depart 12:06, Arrive 14:43
- Train SE4: Depart 14:42, Arrive 17:06
- Train SE6: Depart 10:34, Arrive 13:21
- Train SE8: Depart 23:27, Arrive 15:28
Da Nang to Nha Trang
- Train SE1: Depart 10:46, Arrive 22:28
- Train SE3: Depart 10:24, Arrive 22:03
- Train SE5: Depart 09:11, Arrive 19:40
- Train SE7: Depart 21:56, Arrive 07:37 next day
Da Nang to Ho Chi Minh City
- Train SE1: Depart 10:46, Arrive 04:10 next day
- Train SE3: Depart 13:24, Arrive 05:00 next day
- Train SE5: Depart 09:11, Arrive 04:40 next day
- Train SE7: Depart 21:56, Arrive 15:05 next day
- Swept in from the pub
I would like to hear opinions about special:diff/4685759, should this be reverted or not? The same user inserted the same external link at Japanese Wikivoyage without complying with the existing context so I reverted it, though this edit may match with the Spa subsection in the Do section. I'm looking forward to hear from active users. MathXplore (talk) 05:35, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, MathXplore, I've reverted that edit per our policy on touting. I can't find the relevant policy on ja.voy (could be since I only checked via Wikidata and my ja-0 doesn't help either), but I'd be surprised if there wasn't on ja.voy. Best, --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 06:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC)