Talk:Peng Chau

can you sleep there?

This article more or less explicitly says, you can't, so....? Hobbitschuster (talk) 12:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Anybody? Hobbitschuster (talk) 22:45, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

It almost certainly fails the sleep test, but a lot of Hong Kong's islands are like that. I'd prefer they have discrete articles but won't vigorously protest a merging. Andrewssi2 (talk) 22:49, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

I have no opinion either way, but wanted this pointed out and discussed. Hobbitschuster (talk) 22:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

There are no official hotels or guest houses on Peng Chau, but a search on airbnb shows a couple of options on the island.Kdm852 (talk) 23:38, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Also, I believe the sleep test says that giving alternative places to sleep is permissible. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 02:21, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes, it says:

Asking "can you sleep there?" is a guideline. A particular division of territory into pages of reasonable size might make sense for the destination, but leave one article without a hotel. That's fine. Where no lodging in one district is safe or clean, simply note this and move on.

I think that's an argument for keeping the article as-is. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 02:23, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

• Oppose It has 3 Sees and 2 Dos and some places to eat, drink and buiy. NO reason to merge that I can see. Ground Zero (talk) 18:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose. Look at all the content that's been added! The merge proposal is absurd. I will remove the merge tags now. If anyone would like to argue in favor of a merge, feel free, but I donl't see it at all. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:44, 10 May 2019 (UTC)