Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion/February 2024

From Wikivoyage
Jump to navigation Jump to search
January 2024 Votes for deletion archives for February 2024 (current) March 2024

The extraregion article is too small and its contents can be adequately described in West Country and South Wales. Bodies of water generally don't have their own articles except in cases like the Chilika Lake in India and the Great Lakes in North America. --Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 09:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Outcome: consensus to keep. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 22:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a valid travel article. Can be adequately described in Medieval Britain and Ireland and the United Kingdom. --Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 09:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see the point of having an article for a region which existed over 1000 years ago - it was an independent kingdom between 527 and 879. A redirect to Medieval Britain and Ireland would be of no value, as it is only mentioned once in that article. AlasdairW (talk) 11:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome: deleted. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 22:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Date redirects

Dubious redirects; unlikely to ever be searched. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 03:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to link as many as I can, but there really isn't some mass automation that can do this. At the moment, assume I'm listing every redirect on Category:Vfd. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 03:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the principle is that if content was merged from an article, a redirect is required, and therefore, these need to be kept. You're right that it's unlikely for anyone to search these terms, so why call attention to them by nominating them for deletion? Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see anything that was merged, though. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 05:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I nominated these because it kept messing up with my search results. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 05:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What were you searching for? Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:29, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WV:1st. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 07:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Some of these had content that may be of interest for historical purposes. I suggest reverting to the pre-2014 version of these articles, and then nominating any that really have nothing there. AlasdairW (talk) 23:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome: no consensus → kept. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 11:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]