Talk:Lahn Valley

VFD discussion

Nearly content-less "extraregion", I see no purpose for keeping it and no useful place to redirect. Hobbitschuster (talk) 22:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

• Keep - is a recognizable geographical and tourist area that goes over two states. Yes needs some content but I do not see it is doing any harm. --Traveler100 (talk) 06:57, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
• Do not delete Please be sure to cite a reason for deleting an article from the WV:Deletion policy in nominations. Unless I'm missing something, this would (at worst) be a candidate for merging and redirecting, but there is no reason to delete it. -- Ryan • (talk) • 01:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
• Keep. As Ryan says, regardless of what's done with these extra-region articles, they should not simply be deleted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
• Keep. Pashley (talk) 00:37, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Outcome: Kept. -- Ryan • (talk) • 04:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)