Talk:Södra Kungsleden
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by SHB2000 in topic vfd nom
vfd nom
[edit]Per the one year rule for itineraries. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 01:39, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete.Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:40, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Delete.Keep. Ground Zero (talk) 03:10, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- It is still thin on information, but the recent edits have got it closer to being usable. Ground Zero (talk) 21:35, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. A defined and official hiking route. /Yvwv (talk) 09:04, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't want to see this deleted, but Södra Kungsleden#Go really needs improvement. If not it's hard to justify keeping this even though it ought to be a better article. Any idea what we could with this, besides deleting it? Does someone want to write some content or translate? --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 16:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- Yvwv, just because it's marked, that does not mean it's not subject to deletion. Looking at the 2011 bulk deletion noms, Newell Highway is certainly a famously marked route about 1100km, but since it weren't notable, it got deleted. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 23:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- I suppose one could find information at least about the Dalarna part and add a couple of intermediate stops with not too big an effort. If that's what's needed for keeping it, I suppose it should be done. To make it really useful some more thorough research is needed, more than I'm willing to do on that route. I suppose it is sufficiently famous to be needed if we intend to cover hiking in Sweden, at least as a placeholder. –LPfi (talk) 11:25, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- would moving it into Yvwv's userspace be okay? SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 12:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- Sure, but I'm reconsidering my "delete" vote, because I think a decent "Get in" section would make this article usable in the literal sense that someone could use it to take this hike. Would someone like to add a section explaining how to get to the beginning and end (which could also be the beginning) of the hike? (It would also be nice to explain why the northward order was chosen for the article, rather than the southward direction.) Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:59, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- I think Sälen and Storlien should explain how to reach the ski resorts, although information about whether the transport options are available year round should be added. Would it be enough to defer to these articles with a short comment, and concentrate on reaching the trailhead itself? –LPfi (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- Pretty much so, but it would be nice to also link to the "Get in" sections of those two articles for the convenience of readers wanting to know how to get into those ski resorts. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:34, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- I think Sälen and Storlien should explain how to reach the ski resorts, although information about whether the transport options are available year round should be added. Would it be enough to defer to these articles with a short comment, and concentrate on reaching the trailhead itself? –LPfi (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- Sure, but I'm reconsidering my "delete" vote, because I think a decent "Get in" section would make this article usable in the literal sense that someone could use it to take this hike. Would someone like to add a section explaining how to get to the beginning and end (which could also be the beginning) of the hike? (It would also be nice to explain why the northward order was chosen for the article, rather than the southward direction.) Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:59, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- would moving it into Yvwv's userspace be okay? SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 12:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- I suppose one could find information at least about the Dalarna part and add a couple of intermediate stops with not too big an effort. If that's what's needed for keeping it, I suppose it should be done. To make it really useful some more thorough research is needed, more than I'm willing to do on that route. I suppose it is sufficiently famous to be needed if we intend to cover hiking in Sweden, at least as a placeholder. –LPfi (talk) 11:25, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Outcome: Kept, as it's been. improved by Yvwv and LPfi. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 00:50, 23 September 2021 (UTC)