Jump to content

Talk:Simultala

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikivoyage
Latest comment: 3 years ago by SHB2000 in topic vfd

Is Shimultala in Jharkhand or Bihar? The information at the top of the page is conflicting. (WT-en) WindHorse 01:02, 10 January 2007 (EST)

  • Shimultala is in Bihar. Please see for clarification. -- (WT-en) P.K.Niyogi 12:49, 10 January 2007 (EST)

Sleep

[edit]

Those who are visiting Shimultala may please add names of hotels with telephone numbers and other details. -- (WT-en) P.K.Niyogi 19:56, 26 January 2007 (EST)

vfd

[edit]

Tagged for speedy by Sgroey which I declined. Reason given was:

here's very little info about this place online. There seems to be no tourist infrastructure. It seems to be a tiny hamlet. I edit a lot but have never seen an article about such a small, unknown location with so little concrete information available

--SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 04:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

After further comments by Mx. Granger and Ground Zero, I now vote to keep. Sgroey, as you tagged this article for speedy deletion, like to comment? SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 20:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi all, thanks for your comments. Its my first time nominating for deletion. After reading the other comments, I'm happy for this article to remain. There do seem to be some cool ruins around the area. I'll try editing to include these and make it read nicer. Sorry to waste your time, I'm happy to keep this article. Sgroey (talk) 21:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Keep. Traditionally we don't delete real places, and this article is reasonably well developed and seems to pass the "Sleep" test with three "Sleep" listings. Being a tiny hamlet is not a reason for deletion; see e.g. Childs. If there's not much information about the place online, so much the better – that means Wikivoyage is providing a useful service by giving readers travel information that they can't find elsewhere. —Granger (talk · contribs) 15:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Keep, but I am open to being convinced otherwise. This is far from being the least informative article we have. I have added some information since this was nominated, and deleted one inappropriate See listing. Ground Zero (talk) 17:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Keep per others. Doesn't seem like a good deletion candidate. I reserve judgment on whether it would be best to merge it somewhere; that can be discussed on its talk page or the talk page for the region it's breadcrumbed to. Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:31, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Outcome: Kept. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 09:41, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply