Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion/October 2024
| ← September 2024 | Votes for deletion archives for October 2024 | (current) November 2024 → |
Mongolian sites: Halkh River, Taikhar Rock, Tujiin Nars, Tsonjiin chuluu, Uvs province to merge
Recently created by Temuulen kh (talk · contribs), Enkhriimaa.b7 (talk · contribs), Https.nmio (talk · contribs), Tsekkk (talk · contribs), and Nomio erdene (talk · contribs) respectively, these have all appeared in the past several weeks, had almost no subsequent edits, and seem to be locations that could be merged into another part of the breadcrumbs for Mongolia (note that none of them are actually in this navigation scheme at the moment). Thoughts? Additionally, does anyone know why a bunch of users who had never edited before appeared here on August 8, made semi-long articles about Mongolian locations in just a single edit, and then disappeared? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Are you proposing to merge these? That doesn't require a thread on Vfd. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think that's probably the best outcome, but deleting versus redirecting is a valid discussion in general to have and I'm not an expert on Mongolia, so I am not certain where they should go or what is the most choice information. I don't see the value in these orphan articles that are almost certainly abandoned and not part of the standard navigation existing as they are indefinitely, but I also think there is probably useful information that shouldn't be outright deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- The answer to your question, by the way, is that these folks were making AI articles, just about exclusively on non-article topics, and one admitted it. I would delete all of these articles as non-articles and consider whether to merge/redirect the term "Uvs province" after deletion. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh sheesh. :/ Then yes, delete if for no other reason than copyright concerns. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- The answer to your question, by the way, is that these folks were making AI articles, just about exclusively on non-article topics, and one admitted it. I would delete all of these articles as non-articles and consider whether to merge/redirect the term "Uvs province" after deletion. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think that's probably the best outcome, but deleting versus redirecting is a valid discussion in general to have and I'm not an expert on Mongolia, so I am not certain where they should go or what is the most choice information. I don't see the value in these orphan articles that are almost certainly abandoned and not part of the standard navigation existing as they are indefinitely, but I also think there is probably useful information that shouldn't be outright deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- +1 for delete per Justin and Ikan. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 05:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- +1 per Ikan. A09 (talk) 08:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- delete per Justin and Koavf. Ground Zero (talk) 09:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- delete See also Wikivoyage:User_ban_nominations/Archive#h-MON-20240806093100 & Wikivoyage:Vandalism in progress#Mongolia Pashley (talk) 09:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Outcome: all deleted. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 23:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)