Jump to content

Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion/October 2024

Add links
From Wikivoyage
← September 2024 Votes for deletion archives for October 2024 (current) November 2024 →

Recently created by Temuulen kh (talk · contribs), Enkhriimaa.b7 (talk · contribs), Https.nmio (talk · contribs), Tsekkk (talk · contribs), and Nomio erdene (talk · contribs) respectively, these have all appeared in the past several weeks, had almost no subsequent edits, and seem to be locations that could be merged into another part of the breadcrumbs for Mongolia (note that none of them are actually in this navigation scheme at the moment). Thoughts? Additionally, does anyone know why a bunch of users who had never edited before appeared here on August 8, made semi-long articles about Mongolian locations in just a single edit, and then disappeared? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you proposing to merge these? That doesn't require a thread on Vfd. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's probably the best outcome, but deleting versus redirecting is a valid discussion in general to have and I'm not an expert on Mongolia, so I am not certain where they should go or what is the most choice information. I don't see the value in these orphan articles that are almost certainly abandoned and not part of the standard navigation existing as they are indefinitely, but I also think there is probably useful information that shouldn't be outright deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The answer to your question, by the way, is that these folks were making AI articles, just about exclusively on non-article topics, and one admitted it. I would delete all of these articles as non-articles and consider whether to merge/redirect the term "Uvs province" after deletion. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh sheesh. :/ Then yes, delete if for no other reason than copyright concerns. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
+1 per Ikan. A09 (talk) 08:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome: all deleted. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 23:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Stub (OK, bare outline) with language duplicated from the former Munseom article, which I merged and redirected with Seogwipo but whose former content can be seen on the left side of this link. Attempts at a web search for Moon Island and Mun Island didn't produce much other than this stub. I posted to User talk:Xisuux to ask the article-starter for an explanation of what this article is, but none has been forthcoming so far. I hope they comment in this thread, but I'm not seeing a reason to keep the article at present. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:14, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't speak Korean, but I just figured out that Seom must mean "Island" in Korean, thereby explaining how Moon Island and Mun Island (just added to this Vfd) mean the same thing as Munseom, but it was Munseom that was a more developed article, and the other names don't really show up in web searches, so I think we can delete both of those terms and just keep Munseom as a redirect to Seogwipo. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:15, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome: both deleted. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 00:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First off, this is not even an attempt at a travel guide, but furthermore, I think deletion is probably the appropriate choice, since it is noted by the author as being a translation. Of what? No clue. There is no fr:Etang-Salé, so this is maybe unfree culture that is being reproduced here, so even just redirecting will keep a saved copyvio on the site. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome: deleted per community consensus. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 10:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikivoyage.org/w/index.php?title=Wikivoyage:Votes_for_deletion/October_2024&oldid=4968307"