Jump to content

Talk:Gibraltar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikivoyage
Latest comment: 3 years ago by SHB2000 in topic Miles or Kilometres?
Formatting and language conventions

For articles about Gibraltar, please use the 12-hour clock to show times, e.g. 9AM-noon and 6PM-midnight.

Please show prices in this format: £100, and not not GBP100, GIP100 or 100£.

Please use British spelling.

For future reference the Project:CIA World Factbook 2002 import can be found at Talk:Gibraltar/CIA World Factbook 2002 import.


Confusing instruction

[edit]

I have not been to Gibraltar therefore I may be missing some important context. However I have read the following text a few times and have no ideas what it means:

"After crossing customs, you may be asked to cross the airfield, being absolutely exposed to planes. DO NOT behave differently in this area. Sometimes, if you are on a tour you can stay on the vehicle and citizens using cars can cross by car."

Can someone with local knowledge rewrite or I shall remove? Andrewssi2 (talk) 05:03, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I removed the sentence since there is no way to determine what the author possibly meant. Feel free to add it back if you can guess. Andrewssi2 (talk) 13:08, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bias?

[edit]

Is it just me, or is the text throughout this article written by someone who is very defensive of Gibraltar's status as a British Overseas Territory? Should we make it somewhat more neutral?

I'm not suggesting to take sides on a territory dispute. Just recognize existing British sovereignty but not over emphasize it at every opportunity. --Andrewssi2 (talk) 06:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I agree. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:13, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
Done. I think the edits make it sound more like a travel destination and less like a rabid British Daily Mail editorial. I feel this article is actually missing a lot of legitimate travel information that would be of interest to visitors. Andrewssi2 (talk) 13:10, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Alternative banner for this article?

[edit]
Banner currently used in this article
Suggested new alternative banner

I created a new alternative banner for this article (I initially created it first and foremost so that it would be used at the top of the parallel article in the Hebrew edition of Wikivoyage, yet I later decided to also suggest that the English Wikivoyage community would consider using it here as well). So, which banner do you prefer having at the top of this article? ויקיג'אנקי (talk) 05:01, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

The new banner is very striking, but I love the image of the monkey above the port, so I think I prefer the current banner. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Agree to keep existing banner, the monkey is iconic of Gibraltar --Andrewssi2 (talk) 06:08, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Keep the ape please :) and add the rock of Gibraltar somewhere in the article. Danapit (talk) 14:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
I guess Gibraltar is known primarily for three things: The "rock", its primates and being (at least historically) an important port for the British. Both banners show two of these three aspects but not all of them. We have to ask ourselves, whether we value the rock or the primates as more important.... Hobbitschuster (talk) 15:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Apparently if the apes leave Gibraltar that will mean the end of British rule :) w:Barbary_macaques_in_Gibraltar --Andrewssi2 (talk) 22:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
I very much prefer the second over the first. The photo quality is better and the shot with the rock in the foreground is striking and epic. The one with the macaque is cropped fairly poorly and doesn't work well with the dimensions. Without the rock he's standing on, it just looks like the macaque has been photoshopped in front of the port. Not to mention that the photo is hazy and has smoke rising on the right. I strongly prefer the second. James Atalk 09:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
I don't buy the idea that when an interesting banner has some photographic flaws it must be replaced by a blander banner without those flaws. Better to suggest how to improve the original. Andrewssi2 (talk) 22:59, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
I don't find the new banner bland. I like it. However, I like the composition and image in the current banner more, and I find the image quality good enough for matters of composition and image content to rule the day. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:09, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Proposed Syced (talk) 08:09, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Come on. Given the choice between monkey or no monkey, you have to choose the monkey. Powers (talk) 23:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'd rather go for the new one, It's ways better, colorful and attractive

Seems like we're in the minority, and I'll accept the consensus to keep the status quo. But I still really prefer the new one. I don't accept that the new banner is blander; I find the first one quite bland, being so hazy and dull! But I won't argue the point. There is already a good photo of a cheeky-looking macaque further down in the article. If the current banner remains, then that photo should be removed and replaced with one of the rock as that isn't shown at all. James Atalk 14:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Miles or Kilometres?

[edit]

Does Gibraltar use miles and metres like the UK, or do they use kilometres like the rest of Iberia? SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 04:11, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply