Talk:Mexican Riviera

From Wikivoyage
Jump to navigation Jump to search

So, I'm pretty sure "Mexican Riviera" is a tacky name attached to this area by foreign tour operators. If someone has a better name, or can subdivide this into a different region, please do so! -- (WT-en) Evan 15:22, 10 Nov 2003 (PST)

Merge[edit]

On second thought, the Mexican Riviera includes cities in the Pacific Coast (Mexico) region and the Northern Mexico and Baja California region's, so this isn't a good merger. I think it would be better to restore and develop the article,busing text from Wikipedia. I'll start, to illustrate what it could look like, and we can undo if it doesn't work. Ground Zero (talk) 14:14, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vfd discussion[edit]

There is nothing to merge and no sensible target for a redirect and as the term originates from tourist brochure speech, its status as a "real place" is tenuous at best. Hobbitschuster (talk) 23:52, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Wikipedia article acknowledges its tourist industry origin, which shouldn't surprise. But as it seems to be being used, a redirect would make more sense for our travel guide than deletion. Or, better yet, an expansion. I'm busy the next couple of days, but maybe I'll try something after that. Ground Zero (talk) 00:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

+ It looks as though Pacific Coast (Mexico) might be a decent target for a redirect. Pashley (talk) 01:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a pargaraph there mentioning the "Mexican Riviera" term Pashley (talk) 03:04, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I think it could be kept, although it would be best as a travel topic, perhaps? Mind-changer: Merge with Pacific Coast. I can see where this is headed, and I can see that both articles are really the same, and I've started to merge any information on Mexican Riviera with the Pacific Coast article. Would this now be a consensus? Selfie City (talk) 23:18, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - redirect to Pacific Coast (Mexico) as Pashley suggests. Ground Zero (talk) 18:47, 31 December 2017 (UTC) this nomination us now obsolete as I've expanded the article significantly on January 6. If anyone wants to proceed, this discussion should be started again as the article we have now is not the one we were discussing above. Ground Zero (talk) 22:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Should we remove this discussion if we're going to keep the article? Selfie City (talk) 16:40, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Result: Kept per Ground Zero. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 19:11, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]