Talk:Victor Harbour

Deletion nomination

This is a spelling mistake, because technically Victor Harbor is spelled as "harbor", not "harbour". SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 02:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Keep. Given that it's in Australia, most people would expect the Commonwealth spelling, so the redirect seems appropriate and prudent. Nelson Ricardo 2500 (talk) 02:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Also an FYI, but my pageviews tool says it only has one pageview over the last 365 days. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 02:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Doesn't matter. No reason to delete. Keep as a redirect. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Keep per Ikan Kekek. Pageviews has no bearing on whether an article is kept whatsoever. We could theoretically have very popular articles on topics that out of scope for a travel guide while there are still many travel destinations which unfortunately hardly get any views because because of the SEO setback we're still facing 8 years post-fork. Gizza ^(roam) 04:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

• Speedy keep.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 12:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
• Keep. 1. A perfectly good redirect. 2. Per policy - "As a general rule redirection pages should not be deleted." Please reflect on the policy before nominating more redirects for deletion. Nurg (talk) 05:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

So Nurg, per "A perfectly good redirect", are you saying a spelling mistake is a perfectly good redirect? SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 06:19, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Come on, now! You really think this is an unlikely spelling? Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

• Keep. Reasonably likely spelling. No benefit to delete has been identified. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 09:30, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Outcome: Nomination withdrawn. Can't make my argument here. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 10:45, 27 August 2021 (UTC)