Talk:Southern Chile

From Wikivoyage
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Given the way the sub-regions look like, should we get rid of them for the time being? Hobbitschuster (talk) 16:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Seems reasonable to me. Someone already did away with the subregions for Northern Chile and Central Chile a few years ago. The subregion pages should be redirected to Southern Chile though, not deleted (I believe they correspond to actual states/administrative divisions so it's possible someone could search for them). -Shaundd (talk) 21:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Okay. If there is agreement on this, I suggest we go ahead. Or is there an established policy as for how long to wait with stuff like this? Hobbitschuster (talk) 22:43, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
It usually doesn't hurt to wait a day or two to see if there are other perspectives. -Shaundd (talk) 22:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
I don't have any special knowledge of the area and so can't comment on the merits of redirecting sub-regions, but if they are redirected please be sure that the breadcrumbs for everything currenly {{isPartOf}} those redirected regions are updated appropriately. -- Ryan • (talk) • 23:29, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
The region definitions appeared to be half done. I have now put all the pages in, I think, the correct regions. Number of pages in each region are a little low, but I think the question should be asked again if they are needed based on a proper organization of the region and pages. --Traveler100 (talk) 11:38, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Three years later, where are we? Hobbitschuster (talk) 13:29, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:06, 7 December 2019 (UTC)