Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion/December 2019

← November 2019

Votes for deletion archives for December 2019

(current) January 2020 →

Template:Greycan

The text of this template reads:

"Greyhound Canada terminated all services in Western Canada and Northern Ontario effective October 31, 2018."

As this event happened more than a year ago, it has been removed from all destination articles, and replaced by updated bus information. The template won't be needed again. Ground Zero (talk) 11:32, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 18:38, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Result: deleted. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 14:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cavendish and Rustico Harbour

Article was split to Cavendish (Prince Edward Island) and North Rustico-New Glasgow. -- MuzikMachine (talk) 19:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon me, but why should it be deleted? --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 01:08, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it should be an Extraregion. Gizza^(roam) 01:21, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Redirect per DaGizza and AndreCarrotflower. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 02:03, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but the redirect should point to Prince Edward Island, the next article up the breadcrumb hierarchy. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 03:56, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it is not an actual location and both named locations would be found by entering the names in the search field and readers will be directed to the correct city page rather than with this redirect to one of the pages or to the region page. If the new pages that include the names Cavendish and Rustico Harbour did not exist would agree with redirect, but in this case delete is more useful to the reader. --Traveler100 (talk) 17:35, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The article has existed since 2012 under this name. On Wikipedia any sensible content that has been available under some name should be available via that name forever. For a travel guide link rot (for incoming links) is not that big an issue, but do we have some guidelines on it? --LPfi (talk) 21:00, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I think it would be more convenient for readers who end up there to provide them links to Cavendish and to Rustico Harbour, rather than to Prince Edward Island. Ground Zero (talk) 05:07, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Just as a background, I discovered that the term "Rustico Harbour" is actually inaccurate for the area; the two bodies of water are North Rustico Harbour and Rustico Bay. The heart of the tourist area is Cavendish (Prince Edward Island), while the other town of significance is North Rustico, which the article redirects into North Rustico-New Glasgow. Considering the policy on Bodies of Water (WV:WIAA), and the fact the the article name as is represents a unofficial/inaccurate name for the body of water, along with that the article has been split, that's why I suggested a deletion. I did a "What links here" and 90% of the references were to Cavendish (Prince Edward Island), while the others were updated as a well; the remainder are talk pages. -- MuzikMachine (talk) 21:09, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Result: redirect to Prince Edward Island. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 14:26, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]