Wikivoyage:Requests for comment

Requests for Comment Shortcut: wv:rfc This page allows you to ask other Wikivoyagers to contribute to a discussion, including both policy/style pages as well as actual article content. You may want some feedback, more opinions, or just some help in reaching a consensus. Don't start up conversations here. Direct Wikivoyagers' attention to a discussion going on elsewhere. Please sign and date your request Requests pointing to discussions that have gone dormant for over two months may be removed from this page. Otherwise, the original contributor may remove a request when satisfied. (Please remember to do this, in order to keep the page current!)

Policy planning and proposals

• Wikivoyage talk:Dynamic maps Expedition#Maps and Stars - discussion started by User:ButteBag to try to break the impasse over whether an article can reach star status when it contains a dynamic map. -- Ryan • (talk) • 01:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
• Wikivoyage talk:Destination of the month candidates#Copyscape - Considering SEO/duplicate text as a factor in determining wither to support or oppose DotM/OtBP/FTT candidates: yea or nay? -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 01:09, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Articles and travel content

• France's regions are outdated. There is discussion whether to change the regions, and if so what the new region hierarchy should look like. All comments are appreciated, venez nombreux ! --ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 15:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

• Sheki‎ -- should this be demoted from star to guide status? --Saqib (talk) 19:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

• Move Stein (Mittelfranken) to Stein bei Nürnberg as per its talk page Hobbitschuster (talk) 23:09, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

• Chiang Mai: There is currently discussion at Talk:Chiang Mai#Breaking up the accommodation listings on districting the city. Please participate. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

• Talk:Visayas#Negros_Region.3F has discussion of how the Visayas should be split up. The way the Philippine government divides it has changed; follow their lead (as w:Visayas does) or keep our current scheme, based on the one they have replaced? Pashley (talk) 14:59, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

• We are planning to divide Luxembourg. There are several ways to do this, one more useful than the other, but all with their up and downsides. Please join us in deciding which one of those will be the better option. Wauteurz (talk) 10:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Merge proposals

• Talk:Harris -- 3 settlements in two regions, most POIs not in settlements. Merge Harris and Lewis and keep towns or roll-up town articles into Harris and Lewis articles. -- 31 March 2017

▼ Articles to be merged

  British coast

  Campervan rental

  Carpiquet

  Cebuano phrasebook/Bisaya

  Cycling in Sweden

  Cycling in the United Kingdom

  Grenoside

  Mertert

  Saltcoats

  Sydney/Coogee

  Sydney/Maroubra

  Walkden

  Worsley

  Yamadera

Ideas and expeditions

• If you'd like to help at User:Hobbitschuster/Aggregators be my guest. If we get this to some higher degree of usability we can have an informed decision whether we want that specific article in mainspace, or something like it.